Justice for bricoleurs: Ronald Dworkin and the renewal within tradition from law as literature

Authors

  • Gilberto Morbach Unisinos
  • Luísa Giuliani Bernsts Unisinos

Keywords:

Ronald Dworkin, chain novel, law and literature

Abstract

According to Dworkin, law is an interpretive practice, better understood from an analogy with literature. Like a chain novel, in which each author must write a new chapter in order to create the best possible unified novel, so is the judicial practice. Therefore, from the dworkinian conception of law as literature, this essay, under a phenomenlogical "method" approach, seeks to discuss law as integrity and its underlying possibilities of, on the one hand, renewing tradition and the interpretations of legal practice as a democratic practice, and, on the other hand, respecting the legal tradition. After all, tradition can only be itself in a constant becoming another. (Full abstract available in the original text)

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Gilberto Morbach, Unisinos

Master's degree in Public Law with a CNPq scholarship at Unisinos (present). Bachelor in Law (Universidade Feevale; 2012-2017). A member of Dasein - Núcleo de Estudos Hermenêuticos (Centre of Hermeneutical Studies), and of ABPro (Brazilian Association of Procedural Law). Lawyer.

Luísa Giuliani Bernsts, Unisinos

Master's Degree at Unisinos. Bachelor in Law at IMED. A member of RDL - Rede Brasileira Direito e Literatua.

References

BERLIN, Isaiah. The hedgehog and the fox: an essay on Tolstoy’s view of history. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2013. 144p.

DWORKIN, Ronald. Is democracy possible here? Principles for a new political debate. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2006. 192p.

DWORKIN, Ronald. Justiça para ouriços. Coimbra: Almedina, 2012. 515p.

DWORKIN, Ronald. Law as Interpretation. Critical Inquiry, Chicago, v. 9, n. 1, p. 179-200, set. 1982.

DWORKIN, Ronald. Levando os direitos a sério. São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 2002. 568p.

DWORKIN, Ronald. My Reply to Stanley Fish (and Walter Benn Michaels): Please Don’t Talk about Objectivity Any More. In: MITCHELL, W. J. T. (ed.). The politics of interpretation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1983. 386p.

DWORKIN, Ronald. O império do Direito. São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 1999. 513p.

DWORKIN, Ronald. Uma questão de princípio. São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 2001. 593p.

FISH, Stanley. Working on the Chain Gang: Interpretation in the Law and in Literary Criticism. Critical Inquiry, Chicago, v. 9, n. 1, p. 201-216, set. 1982.

GADAMER, Hans-Georg. Verdade e método: traços fundamentais de uma hermenêutica filosófica. Petrópolis: Vozes, 1999. 731p.

GUEST, Stephen. Ronald Dworkin. Rio de Janeiro: Elsevier, 2010. 313p.

HERSHOVITZ, Scott (ed.). Exploring Law's Empire: the jurisprudence of Ronald Dworkin. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006. 400p.

LAMOND, Grant. Precedent and analogy in legal reasoning. In: ZALTA, Edward N. (ed.). The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford: Metaphysics Research Lab - Stanford University, 2011. Disponível em: <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2016/entries/legal-reas-prec/>. Acesso em: 10 nov. 2017.

LÉVI-STRAUSS, Claude. The savage mind. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1966, 310p.

MARINONI, Luiz Guilherme; ARENHART, Sérgio Cruz; MITIDIERO, Daniel. Novo Curso de Processo Civil: Tutela dos Direitos Mediante Procedimento Comum. São Paulo: Revista dos Tribunais, 2015. 1101p.

MARMOR, Andrei. Interpretation and legal theory. Oxford e Portland: Hart’s Publishing, 2005. 190p.

MELLO, Patrícia Perrone Campos; BARROSO, Luís Roberto. Trabalhando com uma nova lógica: a ascensão dos precedentes no Direito brasileiro. Revista da AGU, Brasília, v. 15, n. 3, pp. 9-52, jul./set. 2016.

MOTTA, Francisco José Borges. Levando o Direito a sério. Porto Alegre: Livraria do Advogado, 2012. 232p.

MOTTA, Francisco José Borges. Ronald Dworkin e a decisão jurídica. Salvador: Juspodivm, 2017. 271p.

PERRY, Stephen R. Judicial obligation, precedent, and the common law. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, Oxford, v. 7, n. 2, pp. 215-257, jul. 1987.

RAATZ, Igor. Precedentes à brasileira: uma autorização para "errar" por último? Consultor Jurídico, São Paulo, 03 out. 2016. Disponível em: <https://www.conjur.com.br/2016-out-03/igor-raatz-precedentes-autorizacao-errar-ultimo>. Acesso em: 02 dez. 2017.

SCHELLY, Judith M. Interpretation in Law: the Dworkin-Fish Debate (or, Soccer amongst the Gahuku-Gama). California Law Review, Berkeley, v. 73, n. 1, p. 158-180, jan. 1985.

STEIN, Ernildo. Às voltas com a metafísica e a fenomenologia. Ijuí: Unijuí, 2014.

STRECK, Lenio Luiz. Art. 926. In: STRECK, Lenio Luiz; NUNES, Dierle; CUNHA, Leonardo (org.). Comentários ao Código de Processo Civil. São Paulo: Saraiva, 2016.

STRECK, Lenio Luiz. Hermenêutica jurídica e(m) crise: uma exploração hermenêutica da construção do Direito. Porto Alegre: Livraria do Advogado, 2013. 455p.

STRECK, Lenio Luiz. Verdade e consenso: Constituição, hermenêutica e teorias discursivas. São Paulo: Saraiva, 2017. 712p.

Published

2018-08-18

Issue

Section

GT 1