“Hacksaw ridge”: freedom and conscientious objection
Keywords:
Hacksaw Ridge, conscientious objection, consciousness, freedom.Abstract
From the film Hacksaw Ridge, this essay seeks to analyze conscientious objection in the democratic state of law, whose guiding values of freedom of conscience, pluralism and democracy must guarantee dissent as broadly as possible. Therefore, will be made an analysis of consciousness in the classical literature of Sophocles and Plato will be carried out; then, the exam of your understanding from Christianity to secularism; after, the verification of conscientious objection within the United States and specifically military; next, the definition of the institute; and, finally, the review of the film Hacksaw Ridge.The method used is the inductive one, seeking, from the analysis of the concrete case to reach general truths, and about the method of procedure, the monographic and historical modes were adopted, using the documentation search technique indirect.
Downloads
References
ARENDT, Hannah. Crises da república. Tradução de José Wolkmann. São Paulo: Perspectiva, 2010.
BERMAN, Eliza. The true story behind hacksaw ridge. Time, New York, nov 03, 2016. Disponível em: <http://time.com/4539373/hacksaw-ridge-movie-true-story/>. Acesso em: 03 set. 2017.
BOBBIO, Norberto. Futuro da democracia. Rio de Janeiro: Paz e Terra, 1986.
COSTA, Nelson Nery. Teoria e realidade da desobediência. Rio de Janeiro: Forense, 2000.
DESMOND DOSS: the real story. 2016. Disponível em: <https://desmonddoss.com/bio/bio-real.php>. Acesso em: 03 set. 2017.
DWORKIN, Ronald. Uma questão de princípio. Tradução Luís Carlos Borges. São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 2000.
GOLDMAN, Emma. Patriotism: a menace to liberty. 2. ed. London: Mother Earth Publishing Association, 1911. p. 133-150. Disponível em: <http://dwardmac.pitzer.edu/anarchist_archives/goldman/aando/patriotism.html>. Acesso em: 25 fev. 2017.
Heringer JR., Bruno. Objeção de consciência e direito penal: justificação e limites. Rio de Janeiro: Luhmen Juris, 2007.
HESSE, Konrad. A força normativa da Constituição. Tradução de Gilmar Ferreira Mendes. Porto Alegre: Sérgio Antônio Fabris Editor, 1991.
LARSEN, Robert L.; HESS, Theodore. Conscientious objection in an all-volunteer military. John’s Law Review, v. 66, p. 687-709, 1992. Disponível em: <https://scholarship.law.stjohns.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=https://www.google.com.br/&httpsredir=1&article=1789&context=lawreview>. Acesso em: 03 set. 2017.
LURIE, Howard R. Conscientious objection: the constitutional questions. West Virginia Law Review, p. 138-161, may 1971. Disponível em: <http://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?handle=hein.journals/wvb73&div=13&id=&page=>. Acesso em: 02 set. 2017.
MILL, John Stuart. On liberty. 1869. p. 15. Disponível em: <http://www.bartleby.com/130/1.html>. Acesso em: 10 set. 2017.
PLATÃO. Diálogos. Tradução de Jaime Bruna. São Paulo: Cultrix, 1956. Disponível em: <http://livros01.livrosgratis.com.br/cv000015.pdf>. Acesso em: 24 fev. 2017.
RAWLS, Frank. Uma teoria da justiça. São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 2016.
RAZ, Joseph. The authority of law: essas on law and morality. 2. ed. New York, Oxfor university press, 2009.
ROSENFELD, Michel. The conscience wars in historical and philosophical perspective: the clash between religious absolutes and democratic pluralism. Paper, 31 aug. 2017. Disponível em: <https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3030366>. Acesso em: 20 nov. 2017.
SchkloveN, Emma. The extraordinary story of Lynchburg’s Desmond T. Doss, ‘a movie plot right the start’. The Daily Progress, 12 nov 2016. Disponível em: <http://www.dailyprogress.com/news/local/the-extraordinary-story-of-lynchburg-s-desmond-t-doss-a/article_9fb44829-2cd7-5ee0-b812-d01494baff0f.html>. Acesso em: 03 set 2017.
SÓFOCLES. Antígona. Porto Alegre: L & PM, 2006.
SORIANO, Ramón. La objeción de conciencia: significado, fundamentos jurídicos y positivacion en el ordenamiento jurídico español. Revista de Estudios Políticos, n. 58, p. 61-110, oct./dec. 1987.
STONE, I.F. O julgamento de Sócrates. Tradução de Paulo Henriques Britto. São Paulo: Companhia das Letras, 2005.
TIEFENBRUN, Susan W. On civil disobedience, jurisprudence, feminism and the law in the antigones of Sophocles and Anouilh. Law & Literature, v. 11, n. 1, p. 35-51, 1995.
UNITED STATES. Supreme Court. United States v. Seeger, 380 U.S. Argued 16-17 nov. 1964. Decided 8 mar. 1965. Disponível em: <https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/380/163/case.html>. Acesso em: 02 set. 2017.
WALZER, Michel. Das obrigações Políticas: ensaios sobre desobediência civil, guerra e cidadania. Rio de Janeiro: Zahar Editores, 1977.
ZINN, Howard. Law, justice and disobedience. Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics e Public Policy, v. 5, n. 4, p.899-920, 1991. Disponível em: <http://scholarship.law.nd.edu/ndjlepp/vol5/iss4/2>. Acesso em: 23 fev. 2017.
