Prison literature in defense of a sentenced to death defendant in Japan – “Tears of ignorance” by Norio Nagayama
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21119/anamps.12.267-283Keywords:
death penalty in Japan, prison literature, defenseAbstract
Japan in the 1960s was in a fast economic growth and there was poverty in every corner of the country. Norio Nagayama, condemned to death and from a poor background, is an example of a criminal who was influenced by such context. Nagayama was a self-learner in the prison time and has succeded in his literary career which has culminated with the Japanese New Literature Award in 1993. He was arrested after committing four murders in 1968, and his case constituted a new milestone for the establishment of the death penalty criteria for the conviction in Japan. The present article intends to analyze the influence of his first work, Tears of Ignorance (1971), in his defense presented in the tribunals which decided for his execution. This work is a compilation of his notes of poetry and prose with direct reference to his childhood and youth events, social justice ideas, and above all, in concern with his inner trip to seek for the motivation of his crimes. In order to do that, an examination on the persistence of the death penalty in the Japanese System is of pivotal importance to get a greater understanding of the context in which the author lived.Downloads
References
CHANG, Li-Ching. The Research Comparison between Law and Literature: As illustrated by Kafka’s “The Trial”, National Taiwan University Law Review, Taiwan, v. 3, n. 1, p. 69-88, 2008.
DANDO, Shigemitsu. Toward the Abolition of Death Penalty, Indiana Law Journal, Bloomington, v. 72, n. 7, p. 7-19, 1996.
GEIS, Gilbert. Pioneers in Criminology VII--Jeremy Bentham (1748-1832), Journal of Criminal Law, Criminology & Police Science, v. 46, p. 159-171, 1955-1956.
GODOY, Arnaldo Moraes. Direito e literatura. Revista de Estudos Judiciários, n. 22, p. 133-136, 2003.
HOSOMI, Kazuyuki. Nagayama Norio-aruhyogenno shimei (Norio Nagayama- O Imperativo de uma expressão), Tóquio: Kawadebukkusu, 2010. 213p.
IGUCHI, Toshio. Sakka no tanjyô. Nagayama Norio ron (O nascimento de um escritor- a teoria sobre Norio Nagayama), Waseda Bungaku, v. 141, n. 8, p. 74-90, 1988.
INTERNATIONAL FEDERATION FOR HUMAN RIGHTS, THE 2003 Death penalty in Japan: a practice unworthy of democracy. Disponível em: <http://www.fidh.org/IMG/pdf/jp359a.pdf>. Acesso em: 15 set. 2015.
ISHIKAWA, Machiko. Writing the sense of the loss in the inner self: a narrative of Nakagami Kenji and Nagayama Norio in Late 1960s. In: 18th BIENNIAL CONFERENCE OF THE JAPANESE STUDIES ASSOCIATION OF AUSTRALIA, Sidney, 2013. Anais... Sidney. Disponível em: <http://japaninstitute.anu.edu.au/sites/default/files/u6/05_Machiko_ISHIKAWA-JSAA2013.pdf>. Acesso em: 21 mar. 2015.
MÉTRAUX, Daniel A. The Nagayama criteria for assessing the death penalty in Japan: reflections of a case suspect. Southeast Review of Asian Studies, v. 31, p. 282-289, 2009.
NAGAE, Neide Hissae. De katai a dazai: apontamentos para uma morfologia do romance do eu. Tese (Doutorado em Literatura)- Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, 2006. 233 f.
NAGAYAMA, Norio. Muchi no namida. Tóquio: Kawadebunko, 1990. 540p.
NEW YORK TIMES, THE. In Secrecy, Japan Hangs a Best-Selling Author, a Killer of 4, Disponível em: <http://www.nytimes.com/1997/08/07/world/ in-secrecy-japan-hangs-a-best-selling-author-a-killer-of-4.html>.Acesso em 15 out. 2015.
OBARA, Mika. Government justification for capital punishment in Japan: case study of de facto moratorium period from 1989 to 1993. Doctoral thesis. Loughborough University, Loughborough, 2013. 322 f.
ONORÉ, Tony. Being Responsible and Being a Victim of Circumstance. In: PROCEEDINGS OF THE BRITISH ACADEMY, Maccabaean Lecture in Jurisprudence, London: British Academy, 1998. p. 169- 187.
OTANI, Kyoko. Soredemokarewoshikeinishimasuka?Abashirikara Peru-he-harukanaru tabi. (Mesmo assim o condenam à morte? De Abashiri ao Peru-a última viagem). Tóquio: Gendaikikakushitsu, 2010. 229 p.
OTSUKA, Eiji. Saigono kyoyoshosetsu (O último romance compartilhado). Chuokoron, Tóquio, v. 11, n.112, p.74-85, 1997.
POSNER, Richard A. Law and literature: a relation reargued, Virginia Law Review, v. 72, n, 8, p. 1351-1392, 1986.
POTTER, Nelson T. The principle of punishment is a categorical imperative, Faculty Publications University of Nebraska–Department of Philosophy, paper 22, p. 169-190, 1998.
SAKI, Ryuzo. Shikeishu Nagayama Norio (Norio Nagayama-O condenado à morte). Tóquio: Kodansha, 1994. 473p.
SATO, Mai. Public attitudes to the death penalty in Japan. In: LEHRFREUND, Saul; JABBAR, Parvais (Eds.). The Death Penalty in Japan. London: The Death Penalty Project; Centre for Prisioner’s Right, 2013. p. 31-53. Disponível em: <http://www.deathpenaltyproject.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/DPP-Japan-report.pdf>. Acesso em: 15 out. 2015.
SINNOT-ARMSTRONG, Walter. Consequentialism. In: ZALTA, Edward N. (Ed.). The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2015 Edition). Disponível em: <http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2015/entries/con sequentialism/>. Acesso em: 15 out. 2015.
TAKEDA, Kazuo. Shishaha mata tatakau - Nagayama Norio saibanno shinsoto shikeiseido (Norio Nagayama - O morto ainda luta; o julgamento e a verdade sobre a pena de Morte). Tóquio: Meisekishoten, 2010. 266p.
TAMAGNONE, Diego e OLIVEIRA, Rejane Pivetta. A igualdade da lei e a diferença da literatura: a narrativa marginal de Ferréz. Revista Língua e Literatura, v. 15, n. 24, p.31-47, 2013.
TRINDADE, André Karam. Kafka e os paradoxos do direito: da ficção à realidade. Diálogos do Direito, v.2, n.2, 2012. Disponível em: <http://ojs.ce suca.edu.br/index.php/dialogosdodireito/article/view/63/76>. Acesso em: 10 out. 2015.
YAKUSHIJI, Koji. Nagayama Norio kikoenakkata kotoba (As palavras que Norio Nagayama não conseguiu escutar), Tóquio: Nihon Hyoronsha, 2006. 257p.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
I grant the journal ANAMORPHOSIS the first publication of my article, licensed under Creative Commons Attribution license (which allows sharing of work, recognition of authorship and initial publication in this journaL - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
I confirm that my article is not being submitted to another publication and has not been published in its entirely on another journal. I take full responsibility for its originality and I will also claim responsibility for charges from claims by third parties concerning the authorship of the article.
I also agree that the manuscript will be submitted according to the journal’s publication rules described above.