“Literary woman” versus “economic man”: antagonism between legal feminist analysis and law and economics
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21119/anamps.12.317-335Keywords:
law and literature, gender, legal feminist analysisAbstract
The Law and Literature is an opponent of a reductive analysis economic rights law and economics. In the same context, there is also a new perspective: the legal feminist analysis, which deals with reflections indispensable to accentuate certain aspects of the specificities of women's rights. There was therefore the need for fragmentation, division in some groups, like the group of women who have suffered abuse for years, requiring gender equality. Instead of simply trying to find reality or disagree with how other lawyers understand the reality, feminist studies, and other intent, tried to change the reality, transforming the way legal scholars to understand. In developing a feminist perspective on law and jurisprudence, however, feminist scholars deployed in the cool modernism to question dominant practices and methods used by traditional scholars for reading and understanding the law.Downloads
References
ALCOFF, Linda. Cultural Feminism versus post-structuralism: the identity crisis in feminism theory. Journal of Women in culture and society, Chicago, v. 13, n. 3, p. 405-36, 1998.
BEAVOUIR, Simone de. O segundo sexo. São Paulo: Difel, 1970. 309p.
BUTLER, Judith. Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. Nova York: Routledge, 1990. Disponível em: <http://books.google.pt/books?hl=pt-BR&lr=&id=2S0xAAAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PT3&dq=judith+butler+gender&ots=CHiWozo3rr&sig=Y9EEZnQP3pLH6ex8evENAWKKDr8&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=judith%20butler%20gender&f=false.> Acesso em: 20 abr. 2015.
BUTLER, Judith. Undoing gender. Nova York: Routledge, 2004. Disponível em: <http://books.google.pt/books?hl=ptBR&lr=&id=BkCSAgAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PP1&dq=judith+butlergender&ots=av37ZPErcQ&sig=9ri2V6tA1fORRgRg4qjCMb505Yk&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=judith%20butler%20gender&f=false.> Acesso em: 30 abr. 2015.
CASTANHEIRA NEVES, Antônio. A crise actual da Filosofia do Direito no contexto da crise global da Filosofia: tópicos para a possibilidade de uma reflexiva reabilitação. Coimbra: Coimbra, 2003. 448p.
DOUZINAS, Costa. The end of human rights. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2000. 408p.
ENGELS, Friederich. The origins of the Family private property and the state. Nova York: International Publishers, 1891. 86p.
FIRESTONE, Shulamith. A dialética do sexo. Rio de Janeiro: Labor, 1976. 130p.
GALDÊNCIO, Ana. «Às portas da lei» (?): reflexos do diálogo divergente entre West e Posner sobre as possíveis leituras de Kafka na perspectiva do Homem perante o Direito. Revista Lusófona de Humanidades e tecnologias, n. 12, p. 133-154, 2008. Disponível em: <http://revistas.ulusofona.pt/index.php/ rhumanidades/article/view/996/817>. Acesso em: 23 maio 2015.
HARAWAY, Donna. Gender for a marxist dictionary. In: HARAWAY, Donna. Symians, Cyborgs, and Women. Nova York: Routledge, 1991. 277p.
HELLSTEN, Sirkker; HOLLI, Anne Maria; DASKALOVA, Krassimira. Women´s citizenship and political rights. Nova York: Palgrave Macmellan, 2006.
HENDERSON, Lynne. Whose Justice? Which Victims? Disponível em: http://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2922&context=facpub>. Acesso em: 23 maio 2015.
KOFFLER, Judith. Forged Alliance: law and literature. Columbia Law Review, Nova York, n. 6, v. 89, p. 1295-1310, 1989.
KRISTJÁNSSON, Kristján. Justice and Desert-based emotions. Aldeburgh: Ashgate Publishing Limited, 2006.
LINHARES, José Manuel Aroso. Imaginação literária e “justiça poética”- um discurso da «área aberta»? Boletim da Faculdade de Direito, Coimbra, v. 85, p. 111-149, 2009.
MERTZ, Elizabeth; FROHMANN, Lisa. Legal Reform and Social Construction: violence, gender and the law. Law and Social Inquiry, Weinheim, v. 19, n. 4, 1994.
MINDA, Gary. Postmodern Legal Movements: law and jurisprudence at Century´s End. Nova York: New York University Press, 1995.
NICHOLSON, Linda. Interpretando o gênero. Revista de Estudos Feministas, São Paulo, v. 8, p. 9-41, 2000.
NUSSBAUM, Martha C. Sex and Social Justice. Nova York: Oxford Univesity Press, 1999. 467p.
NUSSBAUM, Martha C. The Future of Feminist Liberalism. Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association, Chicago, v. 74, n. 2, p. 47-79, 2000.
NUSSBAUM, Martha C. Upheavals of thought: the intelligence of emotions. Nova York: Cambrigde University Press, 2001. 745p.
OKIN, Susan Moller. Equal Citizenship: gender, justice and gender: an unfinished debate. Disponível em: http://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3963&context=flr> Data de acesso: 20 maio 2015.
POSNER, Richard. Law and Literature: a misunderstood relation. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 1988. 371p.
RABENHORTS, Eduardo. Aquela sou eu? Sobre espelhos e mulheres. João Pessoa: Ideia, 2012. 93p.
RESNIK, Judith; HEILBRUN, Carolyn. Convergences: law, literature, feminism. Yale Law School Legal Scholarship Repository. Disponível em: <http://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1925&context=fss_papers.> Acesso em: 10 abr. 2015.
WEST, Robin. Law, Literature and the celebration of authority. Disponível em: < chrome-extension://oemmndcbldboiebfnladdacbdfmadadm/http://scholarship.law.georgetown.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1646&context=facpub> Data de Acesso: 10 jun. 2015.
WEST, Robin. Literature, Culture, and Law. Disponível em: http://scholarship.law.georgetown.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1077&context=fwps_papers> Data de Acesso: 15 jun. 2015.
WEST, Robin. Normative Jurisprudence: an introduction. Nova York: Cambridge University Press, 2011. 205p.
WHITE, J. B. The Cultural Background of “The Legal Imagination”. In: SARAT, A.; FRANK, C.; ANDERSON, M. (Eds.). Teaching Law and Literature. New York: Modern Language Association, 2011. p. 29-39.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
I grant the journal ANAMORPHOSIS the first publication of my article, licensed under Creative Commons Attribution license (which allows sharing of work, recognition of authorship and initial publication in this journaL - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
I confirm that my article is not being submitted to another publication and has not been published in its entirely on another journal. I take full responsibility for its originality and I will also claim responsibility for charges from claims by third parties concerning the authorship of the article.
I also agree that the manuscript will be submitted according to the journal’s publication rules described above.